The recent Rolling Stone article entitled Jahar’s World
about the Boston Marathon bombing was an amazing in-depth article. The article went into great depth and managed
to create an almost three dimensional picture of the bomber himself, delving
into almost every aspect of his and his family’s life. The cover, on the other hand, managed to cause
some very negative feedback. Many thought that the image was glorifying the
bomber, saying that they posed him like a rock star. Never mind that the image
was the same one that was used in an article by the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/05/us/dzhokhar-tsarnaevs-dark-side-carefully-masked.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
), because it was used by a “popular culture” based music magazine, all of a
sudden it is a huge controversy; one that caused several businesses, like CVS,
to take Rolling Stone off of the shelf for that issue.
While the article had an amazing depth to their insight into
the life of the Boston Marathon Bomber, one has to wonder not only how accurate
all this information is, but how will this affect the trial, once things reach
that stage. It seemed that quite a bit of the article was based on second-hand
knowledge, which can be quite distorted by time and other factors. Is it
possible that if the article does get things right, that this information,
coming from one of the larger pop culture and music based magazines, might have
an adverse affect on the trial? And with all the media reports and updates
about this tragedy, how hard will it be to actually fill an impartial jury for
the trial, should things finally come to that end?